''Title IV, § 95a''
1) A body search, i.e. a body cavity search, the taking of a blood
sample, and any other infringement of the physical integrity of a person
shall be admissible where2
1. it must be assumed as a result of certain facts that a person has left
traces the securing and investigation of which is essential for
clarifying an offence,3
2. it must be assumed as a result of certain facts that a person is
concealing items within his body that are subject to seizure, or4
3. facts that are of crucial for the investigation of an offence or for
assessing mental soundness cannot be ascertained in any other way.5
2) A body search in terms of Para. (1) Item (1) shall also be admissible
against persons who belong to a group of persons that can be
individualized by certain characteristics, and where it must be assumed as
a result of certain facts that the perpetrator is within that group of
persons and the investigation of a crime would otherwise be rendered
substantially more difficult.6
3) A body search shall be ordered by the investigating judge on
application of the Prosecution Service. The National Police may carry
out a cheek swab sample on their own initiative unless it is to be taken
for the reasons mentioned in Para. (2) or an order from the court would
be required under the Treaty between the Principality of Liechtenstein
and the Swiss Confederation on Cooperation concerning the Swiss
Information Systems for Fingerprints and DNA Profiles.7
4) Surgical interventions and all interventions that might cause a
health disorder of more than three days' duration shall be inadmissible.
Other interventions may be carried out if the person to be examined has
given his express consent, having received detailed information on the
1 § 95(5) amended by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
2 § 95a(1) introductory sentence inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
3 § 95a(1)(1) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
4 § 95a(1)(2) amended by LGBl. 2012 No. 266.
5 § 95a(1)(3) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
6 § 95a(2) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
7 § 95a(3) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
312.0 Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO)
76
possible consequences. The taking of a blood sample or a similarly
minor intervention in which the occurrence of other than minor
consequences is excluded may be carried out without the consent of the
person concerned if
1. the person is suspect of having committed an offence against life or
limb by performing a dangerous activity under the influence of
alcohol or any other intoxicating substance, or
2. the physical examination of the accused is required to investigate an
offence subject to a penalty of more than five years of imprisonment
or a crime pursuant to Title 10 of the Criminal Code.1
5) Any physical examination shall be carried out by a doctor;
however, a cheek swab sample may also be taken by any other person
specifically trained for this purpose. Furthermore, the provisions of
§§ 93(1), 94(2), 95(1), (3), and (5) on searches shall apply mutatis
mutandis.2
6) On penalty of voidness, the results of a physical examination may
only be used as evidence where
1. the requirements for a physical examination were met,
2. the physical examination was lawfully ordered, and
3. such use serves to prove an offence for which the physical
examination was or could have been ordered.
7) The results of a physical examination which was carried out for
other reasons than criminal proceedings may be used as evidence in
criminal proceedings only where this is required to prove an offence for
which the physical examination could have been ordered.
''Title IV, § 95b5''
1) For the purpose of investigating an offence, it shall be admissible to
examine biological traces on the one hand and material that pertains or
probably pertains to a specific person on the other by methods of
molecular genetics in order to associate the trace with a person or to
1 § 95a(4) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
2 § 95a(5) amended by LGBl. 2012 No. 266.
3 § 95a(6) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
4 § 95a(7) inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
5 § 95b inserted by LGBl. 2012 No. 26.
Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) 312.0
77
determine the identity or ancestry of a person, and to match the data
with the results of molecular genetic examinations that were obtained on
the basis of other legal provisions.
2) A molecular genetic examination, i.e. the determination of those
parts in a person's DNA that serve identification, shall require an order
from the investigating judge unless it is merely a biological trace at the
scene of the offence or a sample taken from a person in a non-invasive
manner (§ 95a(3) last sentence); the National Police may have these
examined on their own initiative.
3) A Liechtenstein or foreign forensic institution or laboratory shall
be commissioned with molecular genetic examination. The material to
be examined shall be delivered to such institution or laboratory in
anonymised form. It shall generally be ensured that data from molecular
genetic examinations can be associated with a specific person only as far
as this is necessary for the purpose of the examination (Para. (1) and (4)).
4) Sample material that pertains or probably pertains to a specific
person and the results of the examination may be used and processed
only as long as a match with the trace or the determination of identity or
ancestry is not impossible; it shall then be destroyed. Other legal
provisions, in particular those of the Police Act, and special rules based
on international treaties shall remain unaffected.
5) Data obtained on the basis of this provision shall be transferred to
the National Police at the latter's request as far as the recording and
processing of such data would be admissible under other rules.
1. Before testifying, each witness shall, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, give an undertaking as to the truthfulness of the evidence to be given by that witness.
2. The testimony of a witness at trial shall be given in person, except to the extent provided by the measures set forth in article 68 or in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. The Court may also permit the giving of viva voce (oral) or recorded testimony of a witness by means of video or audio technology, as well as the introduction of documents or written transcripts, subject to this Statute and in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. These measures shall not be prejudicial to or inconsistent with the rights of the accused.
3. The parties may submit evidence relevant to the case, in accordance with article 64. The Court shall have the authority to request the submission of all evidence that it considers necessary for the determination of the truth.
4. The Court may rule on the relevance or admissibility of any evidence, taking into account, inter alia, the probative value of the evidence and any prejudice that such evidence may cause to a fair trial or to a fair evaluation of the testimony of a witness, in accordance with the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
5. The Court shall respect and observe privileges on confidentiality as provided for in the Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
6. The Court shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but may take judicial notice of them.
7. Evidence obtained by means of a violation of this Statute or internationally recognized human rights shall not be admissible if:
(a) The violation casts substantial doubt on the reliability of the evidence; or
(b) The admission of the evidence would be antithetical to and would seriously damage the integrity of the proceedings.
8. When deciding on the relevance or admissibility of evidence collected by a State, the Court shall not rule on the application of the State's national law.