TITLE II
Extradition from Austria
CHAPTER TWO
Jurisdiction and Procedure
Detention Pending Extradition
§ 29. (3) Prior to a decision imposing detention pending extradition, the person concerned shall be informed of the charges against him/her and shall also be informed that it is in his/her discretion to make a statement, or not to give evidence on the matter and to first consult a defender counsel. The person concerned shall also be informed of his/her right to apply for the holding of a hearing on the admissibility of the extradition. If the person has been arrested and does not yet have a defender counsel, § 59 StPO shall be applied.
(4) If detention pending extradition is imposed on a person who is not represented by a defender counsel, such a defender counsel shall be assigned to this person directly (§ 61 (1) item 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). § 61 (2) to (4) and § 62 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be applied in analogy.
Federal Constitutional Law
Chapter III: Federal Execution
B. Jurisdiction
Art. 83.
(2) No one may be deprived of his lawful judge.
Chapter III - Federal Execution
B. Jurisdiction
Art. 83
(2) No one may be deprived of his lawful judge.
Art. 82(2) No one may be deprived of his lawful judge .
Part 2
Specific provisions
Section 2
17. Questioning of suspects
1. Persons questioned pursuant to a request from the International Criminal Court on suspicion of having committed a crime within its jurisdiction shall, prior thereto, be informed of the crime they are suspected of and of their right to:
(1) remain silent without having to fear that such silence will be taken into consideration in the determination of their guilt or innocence;
(2) be represented by the counsel of their choice, and, where they have no counsel, to be assigned counsel pursuant to paragraph 41(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure;
(3) be questioned in the presence of counsel, unless they waive this right expressly and voluntarily.
2. Such reference to their rights and the corresponding statement by the persons to be questioned shall be noted in the record. Where the conditions of paragraph 41(2) are fulfilled and the person demands to be questioned in the presence of counsel without any application for assignment of counsel, the procedure in paragraph 41(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall apply.
Part 2
Specific provisions
Section 4
Custody pending surrender, surrender and transit
26. Custody pending surrender and orders for surrender
2. Should there be significant doubts as to the identity of the person arrested, the investigating judge shall order appropriate investigations or ask the International Criminal Court to submit additional information. In any event, the investigating judge shall inform the accused person of the grounds of the warrant of arrest issued against him or her by the International Criminal Court and about his or her rights to challenge the surrender on account of a violation of the principle of “ne bis in idem” in article 20 of the Statute or of a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the International Criminal Court pursuant to articles 17 to 19 of the Statute. In addition, the person shall be informed of his or her right, pending a surrender order, to apply for interim release. The accused person shall be provided with copies (photocopies) of the arrest warrant or of the relevant allegations and provisions of the Statute together with the translations of them provided by the International Criminal Court.
Chapter II
European Arrest Warrant and Surrender Procedures between Member States
Part Three
Procedure for Approval of Surrender
Instruction on Legal Rights
§ 16a. (1) A person who has been arrested on the basis of a European arrest warrant has to be instructed in written form on his/her legal rights in a language he/she can understand without delay (§ 171 para. 4 StPO). The instruction in any case has to include
1. the right to be informed about the content of the European arrest warrant by the court when examined by the judge (§ 18, § 29 para. 3 ARHG);
2. the right to get a written translation of the European arrest warrant (§ 56 StPO);
3. the right to involve a defence lawyer in case of arrest including the right to contact with a defence lawyer on duty (§ 18, § 29 para. 3 ARHG, § 59 StPO) and the right to be represented by a defence lawyer in case of detention pending surrender (necessary defence, § 18, § 29 para. 4 ARHG, § 61 para.1 StPO);
4. the possibility to agree to the surrender after conferring with a defence lawyer at the earliest during the first hearing on the detention and the consequences of such declaration (simplified surrender, § 20, § 32 para. 1 to 3 ARHG).
5. the right to be represented by a defence lawyer in the issuing state whose task consists in supporting the Austrian defence lawyer with information and advice.
Chapter II
European Arrest Warrant and Surrender Procedures between Member States
Part Three
Procedure for Approval of Surrender
Instruction on Legal Rights
§ 16a. (3) If the person against whom the European arrest warrant has been issued, is juvenile, she/he is to be instructed on her/his rights pursuant to an analogous application of § 32a of the Juvenile Offencer’s Act 1988 – Jugendgerichtsgesetz 1988 - JGG, Federal Law Gazette No. 599/1988. The legal representative has to be informed of such instruction as soon as possible.
1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:
(a) Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess guilt;
(b) Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to torture or to any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
(c) Shall, if questioned in a language other than a language the person fully understands and speaks, have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness; and
(d) Shall not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention, and shall not be deprived of his or her liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedures as are established in this Statute.
2. Where there are grounds to believe that a person has committed a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court and that person is about to be questioned either by the Prosecutor, or by national authorities pursuant to a request made under Part 9, that person shall also have the following rights of which he or she shall be informed prior to being questioned:
(a) To be informed, prior to being questioned, that there are grounds to believe that he or she has committed a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;
(b) To remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or innocence;
(c) To have legal assistance of the person's choosing, or, if the person does not have legal assistance, to have legal assistance assigned to him or her, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by the person in any such case if the person does not have sufficient means to pay for it; and
(d) To be questioned in the presence of counsel unless the person has voluntarily waived his or her right to counsel.
1. The accused shall be present during the trial.
2. If the accused, being present before the Court, continues to disrupt the trial, the Trial Chamber may remove the accused and shall make provision for him or her to observe the trial and instruct counsel from outside the courtroom, through the use of communications technology, if required. Such measures shall be taken only in exceptional circumstances after other reasonable alternatives have proved inadequate, and only for such duration as is strictly required.
1. Everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty before the Court in accordance with the applicable law.
2. The onus is on the Prosecutor to prove the guilt of the accused.
3. In order to convict the accused, the Court must be convinced of the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
1. In the determination of any charge, the accused shall be entitled to a public hearing, having regard to the provisions of this Statute, to a fair hearing conducted impartially, and to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:
(a) To be informed promptly and in detail of the nature, cause and content of the charge, in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;
(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence and to communicate freely with counsel of the accused's choosing in confidence;
(c) To be tried without undue delay;
(d) Subject to article 63, paragraph 2, to be present at the trial, to conduct the defence in person or through legal assistance of the accused's choosing, to be informed, if the accused does not have legal assistance, of this right and to have legal assistance assigned by the Court in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment if the accused lacks sufficient means to pay for it;
(e) To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him or her and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his or her behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him or her. The accused shall also be entitled to raise defences and to present other evidence admissible under this Statute;
(f) To have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness, if any of the proceedings of or documents presented to the Court are not in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;
(g) Not to be compelled to testify or to confess guilt and to remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or innocence;
(h) To make an unsworn oral or written statement in his or her defence; and
(i) Not to have imposed on him or her any reversal of the burden of proof or any onus of rebuttal.
2. In addition to any other disclosure provided for in this Statute, the Prosecutor shall, as soon as practicable, disclose to the defence evidence in the Prosecutor's possession or control which he or she believes shows or tends to show the innocence of the accused, or to mitigate the guilt of the accused, or which may affect the credibility of prosecution evidence. In case of doubt as to the application of this paragraph, the Court shall decide.