TITLE III
Transit
CHAPTER ONE
Admissibility
Austrian Jurisdiction
§ 45. (1)
2. the person to be transited has already been sentenced in Austria with final and enforceable effect, or has been acquitted with final and enforceable effect, or otherwise exempted from prosecution in Austria for another reason than the absence of Austrian jurisdiction.
TITLE III
Transit
CHAPTER TWO
Competences and Procedure
Surrender
§ 49. (3) The performance of a transit shall be interrupted if
1. after taking over the person to be transited, new facts or evidence emerge which alone or in connection with the transit documents and the results of possible inquiries give rise to serious concerns as to the admissibility of the transit,
TITLE IV
Judicial Assistance to Foreign Countries
CHAPTER ONE
Requirements
Inadmissible Judicial Assistance
§ 51. (1)
2. extradition would be inadmissible pursuant to § 19 items 1 and 2 for the proceedings underlying the request, or
2. Challenges to the admissibility of a case on the grounds referred to in article 17 or challenges to the jurisdiction of the Court may be made by:
(a) An accused or a person for whom a warrant of arrest or a summons to appear has been issued under article 58;
(b) A State which has jurisdiction over a case, on the ground that it is investigating or prosecuting the case or has investigated or prosecuted; or
(c) A State from which acceptance of jurisdiction is required under article 12.
1. Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
3. No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7, 8 or 8 bis shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.
2. Where the person sought for surrender brings a challenge before a national court on the basis of the principle of ne bis in idem as provided in article 20, the requested State shall immediately consult with the Court to determine if there has been a relevant ruling on admissibility. If the case is admissible, the requested State shall proceed with the execution of the request. If an admissibility ruling is pending, the requested State may postpone the execution of the request for surrender of the person until the Court makes a determination on admissibility.