Title II: On fundamental rights, guarantees and duties
Chapter II: On the Guarantees to Fundamental Rights
Article 69: Effective judicial guardianship and due process
All persons, in the exercise of their rights and legitimate interests, have the right to obtain effective judicial guardianship, with respect to the due process that shall be formed by the minimum guarantees that are established in the following:
5. No person may be judged twice for the same charge.
Article 69: Effective judicial guardianship and due process
All persons, in the exercise of their rights and legitimate interests, have the right to obtain effective judicial guardianship, with respect to the due process that shall be formed by the minimum guarantees that are established in the following:
• Right to speedy trial 1. The right to accessible, timely, and free justice.
• Judicial independence
• Right to speedy trial 2. The right to be heard, within a reasonable period and by a competent, independent, and impartial jurisdiction, established previously by law.
• Presumption of innocence in trials 3. The right to be presumed innocent and treated accordingly, while not having been declared guilt by an irrevocable sentence.
• Right to counsel
• Right to public trial 4. The right to a public, oral, and adversarial trial, in all equality and with respect to the right of defense.
• Prohibition of double jeopardy 5. No person may be judged twice for the same charge.
• Protection from self-incrimination 6. No one may be obligated to self-incriminate.
• Protection from ex post facto laws
• Principle of no punishment without law 7. No one may be judged in any way but in accordance to the laws that preexisted the act for which they are charged, before a judge or competent tribunal, and with observance of the full scope of the customs that pertain to each case.
• Regulation of evidence collection 8. Proof that is obtained through violation of the law is null.
• Right to appeal judicial decisions
9. All sentences may be appealed in accordance with the law. The superior court may not increase the sanction imposed when the only person to make an appeal is the convicted person.
10. The norms of due process shall be applied to all kinds of judicial and administrative conduct.
Artículo 76.- Impugnación de la solicitud de entrega por cosa juzgada. La persona cuya entrega sea solicitada por la Corte Penal Internacional tendrá derecho a impugnar esta solicitud de entrega oponiendo ante la Suprema Corte de Justicia, únicamente, las excepciones de cosa juzgada.
Párrafo I.- Las excepciones podrán interponerse en cualquier momento del trámite, hasta las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes de celebrada la audiencia.
Párrafo II.- Deducida la oposición, la Suprema Corte de Justicia suspenderá el trámite de entrega y, con informe al Ministerio Público, celebrará consultas con la Corte Penal Internacional para determinar, conforme al párrafo 2 del artículo 89 del Estatuto de Roma, si ha habido una decisión sobre la admisibilidad de la causa.
Párrafo III.- Si la causa ha sido admitida, continuará el procedimiento de entrega. Si está pendiente la decisión sobre admisibilidad, se aplazará el trámite de la entrega hasta que la Corte Penal Internacional adopte una decisión definitiva. Las resoluciones respectivas serán notificadas al impugnante.
1. Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
3. No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7, 8 or 8 bis shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.