Article 106
Judicial rulings shall be implemented. Refraining from or obstructing the implementation of a judicial ruling in any manner whatsoever shall be considered a crime carrying a penalty of imprisonment or dismissal from position if the accused individual is a public official or assigned to public service. The aggrieved party may file a case directly to the competent court and the National Authority shall guarantee a fair remedy for him.

Article (189)
2. If a person present during the convocation of the session displays a sign of approval or protest, causes noise in any way, or otherwise disrupts the orderly progress of the session, the judge orders him evicted from the court.

3. If he refuses to comply or returns after his eviction, the president sentences him to imprisonment for a term of not more than three days. The sentence is mandatory.

4. If the disruption occurs from someone who performs a function in court, the president may impose such disciplinary penalty on him during the session as his superior is entitled to inflict.

Article (193)
If, during or by reason of the performance of his duty, counsel for one of the parties commits an act which renders him criminally liable or which may be qualified as disruptive of order, the president of the court has minutes recording the incident transcribed. The court may decide to send the minutes to the Attorney General to conduct an investigation if the act gives rise to criminal liability or to the president of the Bar Association if it gives rise to civil liability. Neither the president nor the members of the session at which the incident occurred may serve as members of the court seised of the case.

Article (193)
If, during or by reason of the performance of his duty, counsel for one of the parties commits an act which renders him criminally liable or which may be qualified as disruptive of order, the president of the court has minutes recording the incident transcribed. The court may decide to send the minutes to the Attorney General to conduct an investigation if the act gives rise to criminal liability or to the president of the Bar Association if it gives rise to civil liability. Neither the president nor the members of the session at which the incident occurred may serve as members of the court seised of the case.

Article (261)
If it appears during the trial that the testimony given by a witness under oath in respect of a fact related to the case substantively contradicts his testimony in the preliminary investigation, he is deemed guilty of perjury and the court may condemn him for such crime and, in the light of the circumstances of the case, sentence him to the penalty prescribed therefor.

Article (273)
2. In the event it is established that a statement made by one of the accused or one of the witnesses was obtained by coercion or under threat, such statement is disregarded and not held against him.

106. any person who;
(a) being employed in the public service, and being charged with the performance of any duty by virtue of such employment, corruptly asks, receives or obtains, or agrees or attempts to receive or obtain, any property or benefit of any kind for himself or any other person on account of anything already done or omitted to be done, or to be afterwards done or omitted to be done, by him in the discharge of the duties of his office; or

(b) corruptly gives, confers or procures, or promises or offers to give or confer, or to procure or attempt to procure, to, upon, or for any person employed in the public service, or to, upon, or for any other person, any property or benefit of any kind on account of any such act or omission on the part of the person so employed ;

is guilty of a misdemeanor

131. (1) any person who
(a) by speech or writing uses any words of any judge, whether of a court of a civil, criminal or religious juris-diction or any magistrate, in respect of I his office with intent to defame him in that capacity; or
(b) publishes any invective against a judge, whether of a court of a civil, criminal or religious jurisdiction or any magistrate, with a view to bring the administration of justice into suspicion or contempt ;