Fair trial standards

Iraq

Iraq - Criminal Procedure Code 1971 (2010) EN

Book 2: Investigation of Offences, Collection of Evidence and Initial Investigation
SECTION 5 - METHODS OR COMPULSION TO ATTEND
Chapter 5: Questioning of the Accused 123-129
Article 12336


A. The investigative judge or [judicial] investigator must question the accused within 24 hours of his presentation37, after proving his identity and informing him of the offence of which he is accused. His statements on this should be recorded, with a statement of evidence in his favour. The accused should be questioned again if necessary to establish the truth.


B. Before questioning the accused the investigative judge must inform the accused that:

i) he or she has the right to remain silent and no adverse inference may be drawn from the accused’s decision to exercise that right; ii) he or she has the right to be represented by an attorney, and if he or she is not able to afford representation, the court will provide an attorney at no expense to the accused;


C. The investigative judge or [judicial] investigator must determine whether the accused desires to be represented by an attorney before questioning the accused. If the accused desires an attorney, the investigative judge or [judicial] investigator shall not question the accused until he or she has retained an attorney or until an attorney has been appointed by the court.

Book 2: Investigation of Offences, Collection of Evidence and Initial Investigation
SECTION 5 - METHODS OR COMPULSION TO ATTEND
Chapter 5: Questioning of the Accused 123-129
Article 127


The use of any illegal method to influence the accused and extract an admission38 is not permitted. Mistreatment, threats, injury, enticement, promises, psychological influence or use of drugs or intoxicants are considered illegal methods.

Book 3: Courts
Section 3: Court Procedure 152-229
Chapter 1: General Principles in the Trial 152-166
Article 152


Trial sessions must be open unless the court decides that all or part should be held in private and not

attended by anyone not connected with the cases, for reasons of security or maintaining decency. It may forbid the attendance of certain groups of people.

Book 3: Courts
Section 3: Court Procedure 152-229
Chapter 1: General Principles in the Trial 152-166
Article 155


A. It is not permissible to try any accused who has not been referred to the court.


B. If it becomes clear to the court before judgment on a case is made, that there are other persons linked to the offence, either as principals or as accessories, and procedures have not been taken against them, it may consider the case with regard to the accused present, and request that the investigative authorities take legal proceedings against the other persons or decide to suspend the case until the investigation has been completed.

Book 3: Courts
Section 3: Court Procedure 152-229
Chapter 8: Rulings and Their Reasons 212-226
Sub-chapter 1: The reasons 212-221
Article 212

The court is not permitted, in its ruling, to rely upon a piece of evidence which has not been brought up for discussion or referred to during the hearing, nor is it permitted to rely on a piece of paper given to it by a litigant without the rest of the litigants seeing it. The judge cannot give a ruling on the basis of his personal knowledge.

Article 213


A. The court's verdict in a case is based on the extent to which it is satisfied75 by the evidence76 presented during any stage of the inquiry or the hearing. Evidence includes admission reports, witness statements, written records of an investigation, other official discoveries,

reports of experts and technicians, background information77 and other legally established evidence.


B. One testimony is not sufficient for a ruling if it is not corroborated by background information78 or other convincing evidence or an admission from the accused. The exception to this rule is if the law specifies a particular way of proving a case, which must be followed.


C. The court can accept an admission only if it is satisfied with it79.

Rome Statute

Article 55 Rights of persons during an investigation

1. In respect of an investigation under this Statute, a person:

(a) Shall not be compelled to incriminate himself or herself or to confess guilt;

(b) Shall not be subjected to any form of coercion, duress or threat, to torture or to any other form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;

(c) Shall, if questioned in a language other than a language the person fully understands and speaks, have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness; and

(d) Shall not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention, and shall not be deprived of his or her liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedures as are established in this Statute.

2. Where there are grounds to believe that a person has committed a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court and that person is about to be questioned either by the Prosecutor, or by national authorities pursuant to a request made under Part 9, that person shall also have the following rights of which he or she shall be informed prior to being questioned:

(a) To be informed, prior to being questioned, that there are grounds to believe that he or she has committed a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court;

(b) To remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or innocence;

(c) To have legal assistance of the person's choosing, or, if the person does not have legal assistance, to have legal assistance assigned to him or her, in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment by the person in any such case if the person does not have sufficient means to pay for it; and

(d) To be questioned in the presence of counsel unless the person has voluntarily waived his or her right to counsel.

Article 63 Trial in the presence of the accused

1. The accused shall be present during the trial.

2. If the accused, being present before the Court, continues to disrupt the trial, the Trial Chamber may remove the accused and shall make provision for him or her to observe the trial and instruct counsel from outside the courtroom, through the use of communications technology, if required. Such measures shall be taken only in exceptional circumstances after other reasonable alternatives have proved inadequate, and only for such duration as is strictly required.

Article 66 Presumption of innocence

1. Everyone shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty before the Court in accordance with the applicable law.

2. The onus is on the Prosecutor to prove the guilt of the accused.

3. In order to convict the accused, the Court must be convinced of the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

Article 67 Rights of the accused

1. In the determination of any charge, the accused shall be entitled to a public hearing, having regard to the provisions of this Statute, to a fair hearing conducted impartially, and to the following minimum guarantees, in full equality:

(a) To be informed promptly and in detail of the nature, cause and content of the charge, in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;

(b) To have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence and to communicate freely with counsel of the accused's choosing in confidence;

(c) To be tried without undue delay;

(d) Subject to article 63, paragraph 2, to be present at the trial, to conduct the defence in person or through legal assistance of the accused's choosing, to be informed, if the accused does not have legal assistance, of this right and to have legal assistance assigned by the Court in any case where the interests of justice so require, and without payment if the accused lacks sufficient means to pay for it;

(e) To examine, or have examined, the witnesses against him or her and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his or her behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him or her. The accused shall also be entitled to raise defences and to present other evidence admissible under this Statute;

(f) To have, free of any cost, the assistance of a competent interpreter and such translations as are necessary to meet the requirements of fairness, if any of the proceedings of or documents presented to the Court are not in a language which the accused fully understands and speaks;

(g) Not to be compelled to testify or to confess guilt and to remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or innocence;

(h) To make an unsworn oral or written statement in his or her defence; and

(i) Not to have imposed on him or her any reversal of the burden of proof or any onus of rebuttal.

2. In addition to any other disclosure provided for in this Statute, the Prosecutor shall, as soon as practicable, disclose to the defence evidence in the Prosecutor's possession or control which he or she believes shows or tends to show the innocence of the accused, or to mitigate the guilt of the accused, or which may affect the credibility of prosecution evidence. In case of doubt as to the application of this paragraph, the Court shall decide.