CHAPTER II
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
60. Prohibition of double jeopardy
(a) If an accused is acquitted of an offence by a court, he shall not be tried again for the same or substantially the same offence. If an accused is found guilty and punished for an offence he shall not be tried or punished again for the same or substantially the same offence.
(b) The principle stated in article (a) does not apply to appeals relating to the offence.
CHAPTER 60. NONEXCULPATORY DEFENSES
Section 64 – Former Prosecution for Same Offense as a Bar to Present
Prosecution
A prosecution under the same provision of this Code and based upon the
same facts as a former prosecution is barred if the former prosecution:
(a) resulted in an acquittal, or
(b) resulted in a conviction, or
(c) (1) was terminated by a final order or judgment for the defendant
that has not been set aside, reversed, or vacated, and
(2) would have necessarily required a determination inconsistent
with a fact or a legal proposition to result in conviction; or
(d) was improperly terminated as provided in Subsection (e) of this
Section.
(e) Improper Termination. For purposes of Subsection (d) of this
Section and Section 65(d):
(1) termination is improper if it is for reasons not constituting an
acquittal and it takes place after the first witness is sworn but before
verdict;(2) termination is not improper if:
(A) the defendant consents to the termination or waives
his right to object to the termination, or
(B) the court finds that the termination is necessary
because:
(aa) it is impossible to proceed with the trial in
conformity with law, or
(bb) there is a legal defect in the proceedings that
would make any judgment entered upon a verdict
reversible as a matter of law, or
(cc) prejudicial conduct, in or outside the
courtroom, makes it impossible to proceed with the trial
without injustice to either the defendant or the
Government.
Section 65 – Former Prosecution for Different Offense as a Bar to Present
Prosecution
A prosecution under a different provision of this Code than a former
prosecution or based on different facts is barred if the former prosecution:
(a) resulted in an acquittal or in a conviction and the subsequent
prosecution is for any offense for which the defendant could have been
convicted in the first prosecution, either based on the same conduct or arising
from the same criminal episode, unless the court ordered a separate trial of the
charge of such offense, or
(b) resulted in an acquittal or in a conviction based on the same conduct,
unless:
(1) the offense for which the defendant was formerly convicted or
acquitted and the offense for which he is subsequently prosecuted each
require proof of a fact not required by the other and the statutes defining
these offenses are intended to prevent a substantially different harm or
wrong, or
(2) the second offense was not consummated when the former
trial began; or
(c) (1) was terminated by a final order or judgment for the defendant
that has not been set aside, reversed, or vacated, and
(2) would have necessarily required a determination inconsistent
with a fact or a legal proposition to result in conviction; or
(d) was improperly terminated as provided in Subsection 64(e) and the
subsequent prosecution is for an offense for which the defendant could have
been convicted had the former prosecution not been improperly terminated.
1. Except as provided in this Statute, no person shall be tried before the Court with respect to conduct which formed the basis of crimes for which the person has been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
2. No person shall be tried by another court for a crime referred to in article 5 for which that person has already been convicted or acquitted by the Court.
3. No person who has been tried by another court for conduct also proscribed under article 6, 7, 8 or 8 bis shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same conduct unless the proceedings in the other court:
(a) Were for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court; or
(b) Otherwise were not conducted independently or impartially in accordance with the norms of due process recognized by international law and were conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, was inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.