Article 306. Court Rulings on Criminal Investigative Actions, Special Investigative Measures or Coercive Procedural Measures
A court ruling on criminal investigative actions, special investigative measures or coercive procedural measures shall cover the date and place of its issuance; the last and first names of the investigative judge; the official and the body that filed the motion; the body performing the criminal investigative actions, special investigative measures or coercive procedural measures; the purpose of these actions or measures, the person targeted; a statement authorizing the action or rejecting it if there are objections from the defense counsel, legal representative, suspect, accused, defendant, by motivating their admission or rejection when applying the coercive measure, the duration of the authorization; the official or the body authorized to execute the ruling and the signature of the investigative judge certified by the stamp of the court.
Article 537. Content and Form of the Rogatory Commission
(1) The rogtary letter shall be made in writing and shall include:
4) reference to the criminal case in relation to which legal assistance is requested, information about the factual circumstances in which the actions were committed and their legal qualification, the text of the respective article of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Moldova and data about the damage caused by the respective crime;
2. The request shall, as applicable, contain or be supported by the following:
(a) A concise statement of the purpose of the request and the assistance sought, including the legal basis and the grounds for the request;
Where a State Party receives a request under this Part in relation to which it identifies problems which may impede or prevent the execution of the request, that State shall consult with the Court without delay in order to resolve the matter. Such problems may include, inter alia:
(a) Insufficient information to execute the request;
(b) In the case of a request for surrender, the fact that despite best efforts, the person sought cannot be located or that the investigation conducted has determined that the person in the requested State is clearly not the person named in the warrant; or
(c) The fact that execution of the request in its current form would require the requested State to breach a pre-existing treaty obligation undertaken with respect to another State.