Solicitudes concurrentes – misma conducta

Nueva Zelandia

International Crimes and International Criminal Court Act 2000

PART 4 - ARREST AND SURRENDER OF PERSON TO ICC

Surrender and temporary surrender

47.
Minister must determine whether person to be surrendered—

(2)The Minister must make a surrender order in respect of the person unless—

(b)the Minister is satisfied that 1 of the discretionary restrictions on surrender specified in section 55(2) applies and that it is appropriate in the circumstances that surrender be refused; or

PART 4 - ARREST AND SURRENDER OF PERSON TO ICC

Restrictions on surrender

62.
Procedure where competing request from State Party—

(1)If section 61 applies and the requesting State is a party to the Statute, priority must be given to the request from the ICC if—

(a)the ICC has, under article 18 or article 19 of the Statute, made a determination that the case in respect of which surrender is sought is admissible and that determination takes into account the investigation or prosecution conducted by the requesting State in respect of its request for extradition; or

(b)the ICC makes such a determination after receiving notification of the competing request.

(2)If the request is one to which subsection (1)(b) relates, then, pending the ICC's determination,—

(a)the steps required to be taken under the Extradition Act 1999 in relation to a request for extradition may continue to be taken; but

(b)No person may be surrendered under that Act unless and until the ICC makes its decision on admissibility and determines that the case is inadmissible.

Cf Statute, article 90(2)

PART 4 - ARREST AND SURRENDER OF PERSON TO ICC

Restrictions on surrender

63.
Procedure where competing request from non-State Party—

(1)If section 61 applies and the requesting State is not a party to the Statute, priority must be given to the request for surrender from the ICC if—

(a)New Zealand is not under an international obligation to extradite the person to the requesting State; and

(b)the ICC has determined under article 18 or article 19 of the Statute that the case is admissible.

(2)If section 61 applies and the requesting State is not a party to the Statute, the request for extradition may continue to be dealt with if—

(a)New Zealand is not under an international obligation to extradite the person to the requesting State; and

(b)the ICC has not yet determined under article 18 and article 19 of the Statute that the case is admissible.

(3)Despite subsection (2), no person may be surrendered under the Extradition Act 1999 unless and until the ICC makes its decision on admissibility and determines that the case is inadmissible.

(4)If section 61 applies, the requesting State is not a party to the Statute, and New Zealand is under an international obligation to extradite the person to the requesting State, the Minister must determine whether to surrender the person to the ICC or extradite the person to the requesting State.

(5)Section 99(1) of the Extradition Act 1999 does not apply to a determination made under subsection (4).

(6)In making the determination under subsection (4), the Minister must consider all the relevant factors including, without limitation,—

(a)the respective dates of the requests; and

(b)the interests of the requesting State, including, if relevant, whether the crime was committed in its territory and the nationality of the victims and of the person sought; and

(c)the possibility of subsequent surrender between the ICC and the requesting State.

Cf Statute, article 90(4)-(6)

PART 5 - DOMESTIC PROCEDURES FOR OTHER TYPES OF CO-OPERATION

Restrictions on provision of assistance

114.
Refusal of assistance—

(2)The Attorney-General may refuse a request by the ICC to which this Part applies if—

(b)there are competing requests from the ICC and a State that is not a party to the Statute relating to the same conduct and section 63(4) (as applied by section 119) applies; or

Estatuto de Roma

Artículo 90 Solicitudes concurrentes

3. Cuando no se haya adoptado la decisión a que se hace referencia en el párrafo 2 (a), el Estado requerido tendrá la facultad discrecional, hasta que se dicte la decisión de la Corte prevista en el párrafo 2 (b), de dar curso a la solicitud de extradición presentada por el Estado requirente, pero no la hará efectiva hasta que la Corte haya resuelto que la causa es inadmisible. La Corte adoptará su decisión en procedimiento sumario.

4. Si el Estado requirente no es parte en el presente Estatuto, el Estado requerido, en caso de que no esté obligado por alguna norma internacional a conceder la extradición al Estado requirente, dará prioridad a la solicitud de entrega que le haya hecho la Corte si ésta ha determinado que la causa era admisible.