Enfermedad o deficiencia mental

Kenya

Kenya - Defence Forces Act 2012 (2018) EN

PART IX – COURTS MARTIAL

Finding of insanity

178. Where accused incapable of making defence
(1) If, on the trial of a person by a court-martial, the court is of the opinion that the accused is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making a defence, the court shall so find.
(2) A finding under subsection (1) shall not have effect until it is promulgated in terms of section 183 of this Act.
(3) If a finding under subsection (1) has been promulgated, it shall forthwith be reported to the President, and the accused shall be kept in custody during the President's pleasure in such place and manner as the President may direct, and pending the President's directions the accused shall be kept in service custody.
(4) A finding under subsection (1) of this section shall not be a bar to further proceedings under this Act.

PART IX – COURTS MARTIAL

Finding of insanity

179. Where an accused person is insane
(1) Where a person is charged with an act or omission as an offence, and evidence is presented at the trial of that person for that offence, that the person was insane so as not to be responsible for his acts or omissions at the time when the act was done or the omission made, then if it appears to the court before which the person is being tried that he did the act or made the omission charged but was insane at the time he did or made it, the court shall make a special finding to the effect that the accused was guilty of the act or omission charged but was insane when he did the act or made the omission.

(2) When a special finding is so made, the court shall report the case for the order of the President, and shall meanwhile order the accused to be kept in custody in such place and in such manner as the court shall direct.

(3) The President may order the person to be detained in a mental hospital, prison or other suitable place of safe custody.

(4) The officer in charge of a mental hospital, prison or other place in which a person is detained by an order of the President under subsection (3) shall make a report in writing to the Cabinet Secretary for the consideration of the President in respect of the condition, history and circumstances of the person so detained, at the expiration of a period of three years from the date of the President's order and thereafter at the expiration of each period of two years from the date of the last report.

(5) On consideration of the report, the President may order that the person so detained be discharged or otherwise dealt with, subject to such conditions as to his remaining under supervision in any place or by any person, and to such other conditions for ensuring the safety and welfare of the person in respect of whom the order is made and of the public, as the President thinks fit.

(6) Notwithstanding subsections (4) and (5), a person or persons thereunto empowered by the President may, at any time after a person has been detained by order of the President under subsection (3), make a special report to the Cabinet Secretary for transmission to the President, on the condition, history and circumstances of the person so detained, and the President, on consideration of the report, may order that the person be discharged or otherwise dealt with, subject to such conditions as to his remaining under supervision in any place or by any person, and to such other conditions for ensuring the safety and welfare of the person in respect of whom the order is made and of the public, as the President thinks fit.

(7) The President may at any time order that a person detained by order of the President under subsection (3) be transferred from a mental hospital to a prison or from a mental hospital, or from any place in which he or she is detained or remains under supervision to either a prison or a mental hospital.

Estatuto de Roma

Artículo 31 Circunstancias eximentes de responsabilidad penal

1. Sin perjuicio de las demás circunstancias eximentes de responsabilidad penal establecidas en el presente Estatuto, no será penalmente responsable quien, en el momento de incurrir en una conducta:

(a) Padeciere de una enfermedad o deficiencia mental que le prive de su capacidad para apreciar la ilicitud o naturaleza de su conducta, o de su capacidad para controlar esa conducta a fin de no transgredir la ley;

(b) Estuviere en un estado de intoxicación que le prive de su capacidad para apreciar la ilicitud o naturaleza de su conducta, o de su capacidad para controlar esa conducta a fin de no transgredir la ley, salvo que se haya intoxicado voluntariamente a sabiendas de que, como resultado de la intoxicación, probablemente incurriría en una conducta tipificada como crimen de la competencia de la Corte, o haya hecho caso omiso del riesgo de que ello ocurriere;

(c) Actuare razonablemente en defensa propia o de un tercero o, en el caso de los crímenes de guerra, de un bien que fuese esencial para su supervivencia o la de un tercero o de un bien que fuese esencial para realizar una misión militar, contra un uso inminente e ilícito de la fuerza, en forma proporcional al grado de peligro para él, un tercero o los bienes protegidos. El hecho de participar en una fuerza que realizare una operación de defensa no bastará para constituir una circunstancia eximente de la responsabilidad penal de conformidad con el presente apartado;

(d) Hubiere incurrido en una conducta que presuntamente constituya un crimen de la competencia de la Corte como consecuencia de coacción dimanante de una amenaza inminente de muerte o lesiones corporales graves para él u otra persona, y en que se vea compelido a actuar necesaria y razonablemente para evitar esa amenaza, siempre que no tuviera la intención de causar un daño mayor que el que se proponía evitar. Esa amenaza podrá:

(i) Haber sido hecha por otras personas; o

(ii) Estar constituida por otras circunstancias ajenas a su control.