TITLE III
Transit
CHAPTER ONE
Admissibility
Austrian Jurisdiction
§ 45. (1)
2. the person to be transited has already been sentenced in Austria with final and enforceable effect, or has been acquitted with final and enforceable effect, or otherwise exempted from prosecution in Austria for another reason than the absence of Austrian jurisdiction.
TITLE III
Transit
CHAPTER TWO
Competences and Procedure
Surrender
§ 49. (3) The performance of a transit shall be interrupted if
1. after taking over the person to be transited, new facts or evidence emerge which alone or in connection with the transit documents and the results of possible inquiries give rise to serious concerns as to the admissibility of the transit,
TITLE IV
Judicial Assistance to Foreign Countries
CHAPTER ONE
Requirements
Inadmissible Judicial Assistance
§ 51. (1)
2. extradition would be inadmissible pursuant to § 19 items 1 and 2 for the proceedings underlying the request, or
Part 1
General Provisions
5. Challenge of admissibility of proceedings and their deferral to the International Criminal Court
2. Admissibility shall be challenged where:
(1) the person has been sentenced for or found not guilty of an act by an Austrian court in an enforceable judgement in respect of the act;
Part 1
General Provisions
5. Challenge of admissibility of proceedings and their deferral to the International Criminal Court
2. Admissibility shall be challenged where:
(3) proceedings were already underway before a public prosecutor or a court in Austria on account of the act and were suspended on other than strictly procedural grounds.
Part 2
Specific provisions
Section 4
Custody pending surrender, surrender and transit
26. Custody pending surrender and orders for surrender
2. Should there be significant doubts as to the identity of the person arrested, the investigating judge shall order appropriate investigations or ask the International Criminal Court to submit additional information. In any event, the investigating judge shall inform the accused person of the grounds of the warrant of arrest issued against him or her by the International Criminal Court and about his or her rights to challenge the surrender on account of a violation of the principle of “ne bis in idem” in article 20 of the Statute or of a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the International Criminal Court pursuant to articles 17 to 19 of the Statute. In addition, the person shall be informed of his or her right, pending a surrender order, to apply for interim release. The accused person shall be provided with copies (photocopies) of the arrest warrant or of the relevant allegations and provisions of the Statute together with the translations of them provided by the International Criminal Court.
3. Should the accused person wish to challenge the surrender on account of a violation of article 20 of the Statute or a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the International Criminal Court, the International Criminal Court shall be informed thereof and be provided with the requisite documents. Concurrently, the Court shall be notified of whether the challenge has a suspensive effect.
4. The decision on surrender shall be deferred only in the event of a challenge of admissibility pursuant to paragraph 5(2) above until a decision by the International Criminal Court has been taken. In the event of a challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to articles 17 to 19 of the Statute by a third country, the procedure in paragraph 28 below shall apply.
Chapter II
European Arrest Warrant and Surrender Procedures between Member States
Part Two
Execution of a European Arrest Warrant
Decisions by Third Countries or International Courts
§ 8. The execution of a European arrest warrant is inadmissible if, in connection with the same act, the requested person
5. was convicted or acquitted with final and enforceable effect by the International Criminal Court, the International Court for the Former Yugoslavia or the International Court for Rwanda.
2. Podrán impugnar la admisibilidad de la causa, por uno de los motivos mencionados en el artículo 17, o impugnar la competencia de la Corte:
(a) El acusado o la persona contra la cual se haya dictado una orden de detención o una orden de comparecencia con arreglo al artículo 58;
(b) Un Estado que tenga jurisdicción en la causa porque está investigándola o enjuiciándola o lo ha hecho antes; o
(c) Un Estado cuya aceptación se requiera de conformidad con el artículo 12.
1. Salvo que en el presente Estatuto se disponga otra cosa, nadie será procesado por la Corte en razón de conductas constitutivas de crímenes por los cuales ya hubiere sido condenado o absuelto por la Corte.
2. Nadie será procesado por otro tribunal en razón de uno de los crímenes mencionados en el artículo 5 por el cual la Corte ya le hubiere condenado o absuelto.
3. La Corte no procesará a nadie que haya sido procesado por otro tribunal en razón de hechos también prohibidos en virtud de los artículos 6, 7 u 8 a menos que el proceso en el otro tribunal:
(a) Obedeciera al propósito de sustraer al acusado de su responsabilidad penal por crímenes de la competencia de la Corte; o
(b) No hubiere sido instruido en forma independiente o imparcial de conformidad con las debidas garantías procesales reconocidas por el derecho internacional o lo hubiere sido de alguna manera que, en las circunstancias del caso, fuere incompatible con la intención de someter a la persona a la acción de la justicia.
2. Cuando la persona cuya entrega se pida la impugne ante un tribunal nacional oponiendo la excepción de cosa juzgada de conformidad con el artículo 20, el Estado requerido celebrará de inmediato consultas con la Corte para determinar si ha habido una decisión sobre la admisibilidad de la causa. Si la causa es admisible, el Estado requerido cumplirá la solicitud. Si está pendiente la decisión sobre la admisibilidad, el Estado requerido podrá aplazar la ejecución de la solicitud de entrega hasta que la Corte adopte esa decisión.